'Bringing you the very best in the world of small scale ship modelling'
Battle Class Destroyers,
HP Models, Reviewed by Rob Kernaghan

|
20 Questions about:
The HP RN Battle class 1/700 kit
|
|
|
1. Price? – about £31in the Uk
2. Where to buy? – available in the Uk from Dorking Models or
can also be bought direct from HP(see the link on our website)
|
 |
|
3. What’s in the kit? – The pack consists of
a solid resin hull and all other parts cast onto a series of resin
wafers. Thoughtfully, HP removed the casting plug from the bottom of the
hull. No resin or metal parts but a sheet of flags are included.
4. First impression? First impression is fair, logical
breakdown of parts, cleanly moulded, no breakages. Smaller parts in HP
kits are often badly effected with flash, something that is a problem
with this kit.
|
_small.jpg) |
|
5. Quality of hull and large parts? Very good, looks the part,
dimensions seem fine to me but check for portholes on some moulding they
do appear to dip.
6. Quality of small parts? Generally they are fine, boats,
davits , guns etc nicely moulded but there is the issue of removing the
flash which can result in broken parts. There are spare parts for
this eventuality. Something I especially dislike is that the lattice
mast is cast as solid. Although some HP kits come with brass barrels
this one does not.
|
_small.jpg) |
|
7. Decals? None present which is a pity as these vessels
virtually always wore pennant numbers. The flags are printed onto a
self-adhesive label and are a little too thick.
8. Instructions? Instructions come with plan and profile, parts
list and exploded view drawing. Print quality lacks a little finessse,
but they are easy to follow.
9 Assembly? On the whole a nice kit to build, but bear in mind it
does require some clean-up which will take time. Most difficult part I
found was sanding down B gun deck as this is cast flat onto the wafer
and is otherwise too thick.
|
_small.jpg) |
|
10. Does anything need replacing? Yes. At the very least, the
lattic mast needs replacing with a PE version metal.. The kit will also
need inclined ladders, railings, DC racks, yardarms etc.
11. What extra parts would I recommend?
(a) lattice mast, from WEM’s JKN fret, also the
lattice mast on WEM’s OP class fret is an alternative yards and aerials
can also be sourced from these frets
(b) guardrails, inclined ladders, – all came from WEM’s
Chester fret
(c) gun barrels – brass rod available from WEM
(d) life raft skids, DC racks – from WEM’s J,K,N class fret
(e) alternate weapons – I struggled to find another
source
|
_small.jpg) |
|
12. Is there a dedicated PE fret for the kit? No. I built my
HMS Agincourt as a radar picket ship and sourced the large replacement
masts from a fellow member of Fine Waterline who design them in PE.
I did not buy extra PE for my build but used parts I already had to
hand.
13. Available references? There are plenty to choose from. Well
worth getting are Battle Class destroyers by Peter Hodges, the “In
focus” series from Maritime Books, Battle class destroyers by Patrick
Boniface
14. Camo patterns? Mostly these ships would have worn the
peacetime colours of AP507C light grey and latterly weatherwork grey.
Frequently, but not always, with green decks. If not green, then red
oxide. Where possible try to find an aerial photograph. Off the top of
my head, Barfleur wore the wartime G45/B20/G10 scheme in her early
years.
|
_small.jpg) |
|
15. Rigging? This can be reasonably well determined from
the good quality photographs in the books I cite. As with all ships with
lattice masts, rigging is somewhat less than carried by ships with pole
or tripod masts.
16. Can different versions be made from the kit? Yes. The kit is
available in different fits a kit containing parts for either a 1942 or
a 1943 vessel. A spare Skywave 4.5” turret will enable a build of
Corunna, a pair of Skywave turrets can be added for an Australian
version. Later fits such as the RN radar picket ships or the Iranian
verion with enclosed bridge are readily possible. Not worth attempting
from this kit is a rebuilt Matapan which was so radically different that
a scratchbuild would make more sense.
|
_small.jpg) |
|
17. Would I recommend this to a beginner? No. Partly due it
being expensive and partly beause of the flash making this a kit that
does require experience.
Is it value for money? A little too expensive. Compared with other resin
destroyer kits of the same size, this is an expensive kit. Adding PE and
other parts will add to this cost.
18. That said it is only manufacturer to kit the Battle class,
is of reasonable quality and many regular 1/700 builders will probably
have the upgrade parts as leftovers from other projects. Battle class
destroyers were fine-looking ships and a worthy subject for any fan of
RN escort vessels. This kit will build into a fine model and despite the
cost is, I feel, well worth seeking out.
|
_small.jpg) |
|
19. Would I buy other products from this manufacturer? Yes,
certainly. I have built over 30 kits from them.
20. Any other business? A very enjoyable kit to build
once the clean-up is out of the way and I would recommend it to anyone
who has an interest in the post-war RN or RN destroyers in general.
|
|